Election 2010 Three Debates and a Funeral

by AT on April 30, 2010

Nathan Rothschild banker money lender usurer

Vote as you will, but he gets the money.

The third general election debate between the mainstream party leaders has ended and history has been made. For the first time the electorate has had a chance to properly assess the candidates and their policies, politics has been energised and democracy is the winner, we are assured.

David Cameron won the latest debate, according to the polls. Nick Clegg ran in a fairly distant second and the hapless Gordon Brown trailed in last again. None of them fully explained how the deficit will be cut, all of them agreed immigration should be controlled but won’t admit they have no means to control it and all three warned the coming years will be “tough”.

Cameron blasted Brown about his tax on jobs, Brown warned Cameron’s policies were a danger to the alleged recovery and Clegg wondered why everyone couldn’t just get together and work things out.

Shall I stop now? Because we’ve heard all this before, haven’t we? We heard it in the first debate and then again in the second. We’ve heard it over and over in the scripted party messages and in the rehearsed sound bites carefully designed to avoid any and every question.

You have a week to choose which brand you prefer to deliver your tax increases and cut the services those taxes are supposed to pay for. In the “tough” times ahead your taxes will instead be used to fund the huge ransom paid to the banks that has effectively bankrupted this nation. In reality this is nothing new.

Meanwhile, outside the media tent, Greece is being buried and Portugal, Spain and Ireland are receiving the last rites. The same credit rating agencies that committed breathtaking fraud by gold plating the toxic debt created by the money lenders are trusted, without a murmur, to sign the death warrants of entire nations. The hateful pan-European socialist nightmare is staggering and threatening to fall, potentially taking 400 million people with it.

So which of the three great men will you endorse on May 6th? Which do you feel is best qualified to race to the rescue and throw this catastrophic global crisis into reverse?

Will it be the Tory who wants to count the paper clips and Post-It notes? Or the fake Liberal who wants to integrate completely with the European disaster? Or will it be the prudent man who has steered us to where we are today?

In which order will the British public arrange the deck chairs?

Eventually we will have change. It will either come in a controlled manner or as a series of uncontrollable and cascading calamities. The latter is inevitable if we return to office the same characters that have lead us to the brink. All of them claim our situation is some sort of grand accident brought about by incompetence and carelessness in the City of London and on Wall Street. If true, if these politicians really couldn’t read the flashing red warning signs then why should we believe they are suddenly qualified to rescue us now?

These questions are never asked, certainly not in historic election debates. If you look beyond the stage show though, some people are discussing the real and looming issues.

David Hale said Governor Mervyn King had said the measures would keep whoever wins the next election “out of power for a whole generation” – BBC, Bank of England governor ‘warned of tough times’

Is this why we are preparing for a hung parliament? So that no one party will have to carry the can for what is coming? Is this why the Liberal Democrats are suddenly in the mix?

Money lenders took control of our economy a long time ago. They control the money supply and the interest rates charged on the money they create from thin air to lend to the government in exchange for the labour and tangible assets that rightfully belong to the people of this country. This isn’t even a secret and can easily be discovered by anyone who bothers to look.

Politicians have colluded with the money lenders for centuries. Several great historical figures have attempted to contain the power of the usurers to varying degrees of success, but the cancer has always returned and now has spread to every nation on the planet and we are seeing the inevitable results.

The three “honest” men who want your vote have decided not to discuss this with you because they believe you are too stupid to grasp the reality or may lynch them if you discover the truth.

You are intelligent enough to understand that debt can never be money nor can credit provide sustainable prosperity. When expressed in the economic gobbledygook preferred by those who hope to keep you ignorant our economy may seem complex. But in plain English you surely know that using your credit card to consume beyond your means invariably results in bankruptcy.

These three debates are nothing more than a continuation of the great lie and regardless of the choices made on May 6th this will end in bitter tears.

Bookmark and Share

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Jefferson Davis April 30, 2010 at 8:30 am

Well said. Brilliantly written.

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: